AI writing? Check it here.

Review a draft, article, or supplied passage before publication. Paste writing or open a document for GPTZero screening and separate local observations. You choose when to send it.

What this tool can tell you

What it can doScreen text with GPTZero after consent and report local writing observations separately, including contrasting evidence.

What it cannot doGuarantee a correct result or prove who wrote something. Detectors can miss AI and flag human writing.

How to use these tools and read your results

Add your writing

A detector scan needs at least 50 words. TXT, DOCX or selectable-text PDF up to 8 MB also work.

Scan paper pages with a camera
Scan paper pages

Scan pages with camera

Stays on this device

Scanning photographs one page and uses OCR on this device to turn visible writing into editable text. Nothing is uploaded. OCR can misread words, punctuation, columns, handwriting, page numbers, footnotes, tables, and damaged pages. You must compare and correct the result. The photograph is not analyzed, and a successful scan does not prove authorship or origin.

Choose how to check

Add your writing to continue.

Your result

See a sample report (opens in a new tab)

Your result will appear here

Add your writing, choose how to check, and press the button.

  • ✓ A plain-language assessment
  • ✓ What it means — and what it doesn’t
  • ✓ Suggested next steps you can tick off
  • ✓ A report to keep (your text is excluded)
Compare two drafts

Compare how two drafts changed

Both drafts remain in browser memory. This describes changes; it does not identify a writer, editor, model, or tool.

Browser memory only · no upload · no retention · source text excluded from export

Research results and measurement glossary

What the paired pattern did in recent tests

These are aggregate pattern counts from fixed, bounded studies. They are not accuracy, probability, sensitivity, specificity, or proof of authorship. The rule was not changed after these results were reviewed.

Document typeTransformed synthetic samplesHuman reference samples
Essay5 / 6 showed the pair0 / 30 across 10 source groups showed the pair
Article5 / 6 showed the pair0 / 17 across 8 source groups showed the pair
Review6 / 6 showed the pair4 / 30; author grouping unavailable showed the pair

Important: Human reviews also produced the pattern combination. Editing, genre conventions, translation, templates, and individual style can create similar measurements. Review results therefore need especially cautious interpretation and provenance checks.

What the measurements mean

Measurements describe visible structure and wording only. The paired-pattern review is document-aware, abstains where evidence is too limited, and must be considered alongside counterexamples and provenance.

Sentence-length variation

How much sentence length changes within this sample.

Vocabulary distribution

How broadly words are distributed across moving passages.

Repeated phrases

Repeated three-word sequences; topics, quotations, and templates can create them.

Transitions and hedges

Linking and qualifying words that may reflect genre, editing, or style.

Template-shaped phrases

A small fixed list of common formulaic phrases, never a universal signature.

Citation-shaped patterns

Reference-like forms, not validation that a source is accurate.

Style shift

A change in average sentence length between halves of the document.

Evidence state

A review state—not a classification of who or what wrote the text.